Rule Hub · DrivingUS requirements, state by state

Is Missouri an At-Fault or No-Fault State?

No — Missouri is an at-fault (tort) state, not a no-fault state.

Fault system
At-fault (tort)

The driver responsible for a crash, and their liability insurer, pays. Missouri requires liability coverage and has no no-fault or PIP system.

Comparative negligence rule
Pure comparative

Set by the Missouri Supreme Court in Gustafson v. Benda (1983), not by statute. There is no cutoff: your damages go down by your own share of fault, so you can recover even if you were mostly at fault. RSMo § 537.765 writes pure comparative fault into statute only for product liability claims.

How Missouri compares with every other state

What the fault rule decides

In an at-fault state the driver who caused the crash — through their liability insurer — pays for the harm. That is the arrangement in 38 of the 51 jurisdictions on this site, so it is the one most US advice assumes. The practical consequence is that your recovery depends on two things you do not control: how much liability cover the other driver bought, and what share of the blame you are assigned.

Pure comparative fault has no cliff. Your damages are cut by your share of the blame and nothing more: on a hypothetical $100,000, a driver 80% at fault still recovers $20,000. 9 of the 50 jurisdictions on this site work this way. It is the most forgiving arrangement for a driver who was mostly but not entirely in the wrong, and the reason a claim worth little in a neighboring state can still be worth bringing here.

Every statute cited for Missouri

Why the rule looks like this

More on Missouri

Checked against the primary sources above on September 22, 2026. If a figure here is wrong, tell us and we will fix it — what we have corrected so far is public.