Rule Hub · DrivingUS requirements, state by state

Is Vermont an At-Fault or No-Fault State?

No — Vermont is an at-fault (tort) state, not a no-fault state.

Fault system
At-fault (tort)

The driver who caused the crash, and that driver's insurer, pays. Vermont has no personal injury protection and no threshold that has to be cleared before you can sue for pain and suffering.

Comparative negligence rule
Modified comparative — 51% bar

Your own negligence does not bar recovery as long as it "was not greater than the causal total negligence of the defendant or defendants" — so at 50 percent or less you still recover, and the award is cut by your share. Where more than one defendant is liable, each pays in proportion to that defendant's share of the total fault rather than the whole judgment.

How Vermont compares with every other state

What the fault rule decides

In an at-fault state the driver who caused the crash — through their liability insurer — pays for the harm. That is the arrangement in 38 of the 51 jurisdictions on this site, so it is the one most US advice assumes. The practical consequence is that your recovery depends on two things you do not control: how much liability cover the other driver bought, and what share of the blame you are assigned.

Modified comparative fault turns the case into a percentage. On a hypothetical $100,000 of damages — arithmetic, not a figure from Vermont law — being 20% to blame leaves you $80,000, and being 40% to blame leaves you $60,000. Cross the line at 51% and the award is not reduced, it is gone. 24 of the 50 jurisdictions on this site draw the line in the same place, and the whole dispute after a serious crash tends to be about which side of it you land on.

Every statute cited for Vermont

Why the rule looks like this

More on Vermont

Checked against the primary sources above on September 30, 2026. If a figure here is wrong, tell us and we will fix it — what we have corrected so far is public.